- #Best settings for iridient x transformer for mac os#
- #Best settings for iridient x transformer full size#
- #Best settings for iridient x transformer free#
- #Best settings for iridient x transformer windows#
Over the last year or so I had been thinking that Lightroom had caught up a lot and maybe there wouldn’t be a whole lot of difference between X-Transformer results and a native Lightroom import.
#Best settings for iridient x transformer free#
Once X-Transformer has produced the dng file you are free to import it into any raw processor you like which supports the dng format – for example Adobe Lightroom. What it does is de-mosaic the Fuji raw file and store it as a dng (Digital Negative) file. Iridient X-Transformer isn’t a full-blown raw processing package.
#Best settings for iridient x transformer windows#
I had been checking the Iridient Digital web site for any further news of a Windows release for several months and then just as it seemed like nothing was ever going to happen I seem to have missed the notification by about a week. This was exciting news for me as I found it galling that despite much improvement over the last couple of years Lightroom still didn’t seem to render Fuji raw files as well as Iridient did.
Last year I read rumors that Iridient were working on “something for Windows”. As a keen amateur photographer (ie – not somebody who makes a lot of money out of photography) I was not going to switch back to using Macs again just to be able to run Iridient Developer, no matter how much better it might make my results.
#Best settings for iridient x transformer for mac os#
The software was only available for Mac OS and I switched back from Mac OS to Windows several years ago now.
Impressed as I was by the results I was seeing being obtained using Iridient Developer it was sadly not for me.
This seemed all the more remarkable as Iridient Digital is a “small” company, indeed to the best of my knowledge a “one-man band”. Iridient seemed to create cleaner, clearer, sharper renderings of the same image. I have often been astonished by the apparent difference in the rendering of Fuji raw files between Adobe Lightroom and Iridient Developer. Back then I was a Canon shooter but for the last several years I’ve been shooting more and more Fuji to the point where as I write I’ve not shot using my Canon gear for over a year.Īs a Fuji shooter I have been aware of the raw processing software “ Iridient Developer” for quite some time. I use Adobe Lightroom as my raw processing software of choice and I have done so since it was first released.
#Best settings for iridient x transformer full size#
Click to see full size (X-Pro2, Fujinon 10-24mm f4 – yes, I know – not a “portrait lens”!) Any thought welcome.1:1 crops : default Lightroom import on the left, same file processed with Iridient X-Transformer to the right. It was certainly good for LR, but for C1 I've no definite idea about necessity. I would like to hear opinions if Iridient transformer is still necessary when using C1. I haven't seen the Iridium settings tools being outrageous better, I use iridium for the core business only to interpret the Xtrans data. It is all bloody time consuming enough working in LR or C1 so that I really don't need another page of Iridium settings to deal with, so I keep the iridium settings fixed as lean as possible.
So I don't use it to play with it's settings for varying pictures, I've found my general preferred Iridium settings and done with it. You ain't got a preview when you play with Iridient settings, it's so cumbersome to fool around with it, there is no flow in working with it. So far if I want smoother I'll use post processing for that. Please share a clue if you have one, thanks. MORE DETAILED did not showed me pixel peeping problems in various shots, to be honest I have no idea why SMOOTHER exist. So I only had to bother about Iridient MORE DETAILED or SMOOTHER. Therefore I choose to have only 1 setting in Iridient that seems to work for all, and leave the rest of tasks to LR or C1 or PS. If you start to jockey around with setting in Iridient differently for different kind of pictures, are you really going to keep track of what you do in iridient compared to what you did in LR or C1 or PS? Sometimes I feel like it did nothing at all? Iridient could do a better job in finding/treating CA. For all purposes I have only 1 setting no matter what program follows.:
0 kommentar(er)
